Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Patience has paid off for UFC fighter Cain Velasquez

UFC heavyweight champion Cain Velasquez isn't accustomed to sitting around and living the life of a couch potato.

That created a challenge for him after he underwent surgery in January for a major tear of his right rotator cuff and doctors strictly limited his physical activity. He had to talk himself into being patient and obeying their orders, trading short-term frustration for the promise of long-term gain.

"It took five months of not doing anything," said Velasquez, known for his devotion to working out and the hours he spends in the gym. "It was hard, but I knew the less I did the faster I would come back, and I have."

Velasquez, who won his title with a first-round technical knockout of Brock Lesnar at Honda Center last October, said he is on track for a return to the scene of his triumph Nov. 12. He is scheduled to fight top contender Junior dos Santos in a five-round bout that is to headline the first UFC card broadcast on Fox.

Velasquez, a native of Salinas, said he has no doubts about his shoulder as he prepares for his bout.

"The shoulder feels good. Training is going good," he said by phone Wednesday. "I'm doing hard workouts and my body feels good. I feel ready and confident for my upcoming fight.

"I had a lot of trust in my doctors. I just followed their instructions through the rehab and I just slowly felt the progress from the beginning of how much better it was getting, up until I got back into the weight room and got things back to where I was before. My body is 100%."

While he healed, he said he went on promotional appearances for the UFC and spent time with his family, which includes his 2½-year-old daughter, Coral.

"That kind of kept my head from being too down, being around my family and being positive with them," he said. "They helped me through it."
 
-- Helene Elliott

Week 7 Film Review: Roethlisberger Buys Time

A closer look at some of the matchups in Week 7, with the benefit of film review:

Steelers O vs. Cardinals D

This game was just another showcase of Ben Roethlisberger’s uncanny ability to extend the play. He seemed not to even bother to read the defense before many snaps. Instead, he preferred to let the pass-rush define itself and then react. No other N.F.L. quarterback can have consistent success playing this way (not even Michael Vick). Roethlisberger made it work with his strength and underrated accuracy. Antonio Brown and Heath Miller were his go-to receivers most of the afternoon. That’s partly because cornerback Patrick Peterson did a stellar job of defending Mike Wallace (Peterson was not involved in the coverage on Wallace’s 95-yard touchdown – a play that was 90 percent about Wallace’s incredible speed and 10 percent about safety Rashad Jones’s playing just a tad too shallow). With the exception of left guard Chris Kemoeatu, who struggled in his first game back from a two-week knee injury, the Steelers offensive line was decent in pass protection. The running game was inconsistent for the first 50 minutes, however, with swift Cardinals linebacker Daryl Washington making several outstanding backfield stops.

Cardinals O vs. Steelers D

It was pretty much what you’d expect: the Cardinals did not muster a consistent ground game because the Steelers linebackers were too fast and aggressive (an active three-man defensive line enables that). Ike Taylor did a solid job shadowing Larry Fitzgerald (a notable portion of Fitzgerald’s catches came late against a semi-prevent defense; as for Taylor’s three first-half penalties, they were worth it considering he was able to be grabby in coverage for much of the afternoon). LaMarr Woodley was spectacular in getting off blocks. From the file of “unexpected,” the third-string nose tackle Steve McLendon had a terrific game. He’s not built to be a low-leveraged clogger, and he didn’t draw double teams the way Casey Hampton would, but he made a vast array of solo run stops in the first half.

For Arizona, there should be concern about the inability of the “non-Fitzgerald receivers” to get open. Also, several of their pass protection concepts were just plain wrong (they slid away from Woodley’s side and toward a non-blitzing Lawrence Timmons on more than one occasion). And finally, Kevin Kolb’s accuracy was awful whenever he threw off-balance.

Falcons O vs. Lions D

The Motor City crowd witnessed a very well-played game by both teams on this side of the ball. The concerns about Detroit’s run defense are overblown. The Lions held Michael Turner to roughly two yards per carry with the exception of a 51-yard run that was set up by fantastic run-blocking execution and a few missed tackles. The Falcons used a similar tactic on that play that the Niners used last week against the Lions: allow the left defensive tackle (Ndamukong Suh or Corey Williams) to penetrate and then block them from the backside (the Niners used a tight end in motion to do it; the Falcons used center Todd McClure). This creates a natural hole that, if you can keep the linebackers out of, puts your running back one-on-one against a safety. Great play.

On most occasions, however, the Falcons could not get Lions linebackers blocked. DeAndre Levy dominated the first three quarters and Stephen Tulloch took over in the fourth. Safety Louis Delmas was also a potent eighth box defender throughout. All three were able to use their  downhill speed freely because the Lions’ defensive line consistently outperformed Atlanta’s sluggish front five.

Through the air, Matt Ryan did a superb job stepping up in the pocket and getting the ball out quickly (three- and five-step drops were a big part of the plan). Atlanta used good underneath route combinations against Detroit’s Cover 2 and Cover 3 looks (something they haven’t always done this season) and consistently exploited the linebackers’ inability to defend Tony Gonzalez (who was brilliant as a route runner).

Lions O vs. Falcons D

The Falcons successfully attacked Detroit’s mediocre offensive line with a combination of disguised blitzes and A-gap crowding looks. This helped dictate pro-Falcons one-on-one mismatches for ends John Abraham and Ray Edwards against tackles Jeff Backus and Gosder Cherilus. More important, Matthew Stafford never quite got comfortable with all this. This is one example of the hidden ways a bankrupt rushing attack hinders an offense. Even with Jahvid Best out, the Lions may regret not running more in this game. Maurice Morris actually had a little success running out of the shotgun. Maybe it wouldn’t have mattered; aside from a few athletic Calvin Johnson plays, the Lions generated nothing with their wideouts.

 

Browns O vs. Seahawks D

Seattle’s entire defense played well, but it wasn’t exactly challenged. What’s worrisome is Cleveland’s inability to spread the field and play basic pass offense. Too much of the aerial attack is predicated on play-action and rollouts. That’s what you do when you want to simplify your quarterback’s reads and put minimal demands on his arm strength. The question is whether the Browns continue to employ this tactic because of Colt McCoy or because of their nonexistent speed at wide receiver.

Montario Hardesty caught some grief for gaining less than 100 yards on 33 carries. He wasn’t great in this game (he must learn to hit the hole earlier in the run and gain better balance by having a lower center of gravity), but the bigger issue was the lethargic play of guards Jason Pinkston, Shawn Lauvao (who left with a bruised knee) and John Greco (a big guy who was good north and south but poor east and west). One final note: Seattle’s Chris Clemons has been arguably the best all-around defensive end in the N.F.C. this season.

Seahawks O vs. Browns D

This game may prove damaging to Charlie Whitehurst’s career. Why would a team  want him as a starter after this? His long-term future as a backup may even be in doubt.  And this performance came against a very average defense, no less. Whitehurst did not make a bunch of bonehead mistakes, the way Rex Grossman did a week ago, but that was partly because he often could not even bring himself to pull the trigger. He had a tendency to fixate on a target before throwing. He left a lot of open receivers on the field. He had little sense for pocket movement. And, despite outstanding protection for much of the afternoon, he was wildly inaccurate, especially downfield.

Dolphins O vs. Broncos D

The story of this matchup was Denver’s successful blitzing. The entire Dolphins offense struggled against the blitz. The running backs were iffy in pickup; the receivers did not always spot hot route assignments; and quarterback Matt Moore did not consistently identify potential pass-rushers before the snap. The Broncos often blitzed a linebacker inside and brought a speedier player (either a defensive back or, in overtime, sensationally athletic strongside linebacker D.J. Williams) a half-beat after that outside. Miami’s passing game has been way out of sync the past few weeks. For Denver, two other things stood out: the speed and initial burst of Von Miller off the edge, and the energy and instincts of Brian Dawkins  in the box.

Andy Benoit is an N.F.L. analyst for CBSSports.com and founder of NFLTouchdown.com. He can be reached at andy.benoit@NFLTouchdown.com or @Andy_Benoit.

Got Questions? Battista Has Answers

Is Christian Ponder for real after an impressive debut as the Minnesota Vikings’ starting quarterback? Does Plaxico Burress’s re-emergence and two straight victories mean the Jets are back? Should the Peyton Manning-less Colts pack the whole thing back onto the moving vans? Judy Battista, The Times’s N.F.L. reporter, will again answer selected questions from readers this week. Use the comment field below to ask your questions, and the answers will appear on The Fifth Down on Friday.

Greatest sports figures in L.A. history, No. 10: Jackie Robinson

FabforumContinuing our countdown of the 20 greatest figures in L.A. sports history, as chosen in voting by our online readers, with No. 10, Jackie Robinson.

No. 10 Jackie Robinson (21 first-place votes, 1,702 points)

It was interesting to watch the votes come in for Jackie Robinson, particularly through the comments on our original blog post asking for votes. As soon as someone would vote for Robinson, it seemed someone else would chime in, chastising the person for not realizing Robinson never played with the Dodgers in L.A. Which just goes to show how a man can be remembered for one thing almost to the exclusion of everything else. When you think Jackie Robinson, you think "broke the color barrier in baseball" and have to be reminded of his outstanding legacy as one of the greatest athletes in UCLA history.

Robinson was UCLA's first athlete to win varsity letters in four sports: baseball, basketball, football and track. He was one of four black players on the 1939 UCLA Bruins football team (Woody Strode, Kenny Washington and Ray Bartlett were the others).

In track and field, Robinson won the long jump at the 1940 NCAA men's outdoor track and field championship, jumping 24 feet, 10 1/2 inches. 

In basketball, Robinson won two consecutive conference scoring titles.

He hit less than .200 with the Bruins baseball team, making baseball his worst sport at UCLA.

Robinson was also a standout athlete at Pasadena Muir High and Pasadena junior college.

Robinson's life after UCLA could fill several books. He is a more-than-worthy addition to this list. As former UCLA chancellor Norm Abrams once said: "He was the first athlete in UCLA history to letter in four sports in the same year, but it is his abiding dignity and unshakable conviction that we most appreciate and that made him a true champion. The entire Bruin family treasures his legacy."

RELATED:

No. 11: Tommy Lasorda

No. 12: Wayne Gretzky

No. 13: Walter O'Malley

No. 14: Don Drysdale

No. 15: Merlin Olsen

No. 16: Jerry Buss

No. 17: Elgin Baylor

No. 18: Marcus Allen

No. 19: Jim Murray

No. 20: Wilt Chamberlain

Your votes are in: The 20 greatest sports figures in L.A. history

-- Houston Mitchell

Photo: Jackie Robinson at UCLA. Credit: Los Angeles Times

Did Topps turn down a deal on Maury Wills because he was such a bad prospect?

Fabforum

BASEBALL URBAN LEGEND: Maury Wills was such a longshot to make it in the Major Leagues that Topps turned down the opportunity to sign him to a $5 baseball card contract.

Maury Wills is a true Los Angeles Dodgers legend. The Dodgers won their first championship in Los Angeles in Wills' first season and went on to win two more titles during his first tenure with the team (1959-1966), with Wills being the team captain from 1963-1966. Wills made the All Star Game in five separate seasons and received the very first All Star Game Most Valuable Player Award ever in 1962! That same season, Wills beat out Willie Mays to win the National League Most Valuable Player Award. In 1962, Wills also won his second Gold Glove at shortstop and set a new Modern Era (post-1900) Major League record for the most stolen bases in a single season with 104 (the first player ever to steal over 100 bases in the Modern Era). Wills' revival of the stolen base is probably his greatest legacy. Before he stole 50 bases in 1960, no National Leaguer had stolen 50 bases since 1923! Players like Lou Brock, Rickey Henderson and Vince Coleman were all inspired by Wills. However, while Wills was setting records and showing up on Most Valuable Player ballots there was one place he was conspicuously absent - packs of Topps baseball cards! Wills did not have a Topps baseball card until 1967, nearly a decade into his Major League career! For a card company that prided itself on having basically every Major Leaguer in the game, Wills was a notable exception. What makes it even more notable is why Topps did not have a Maury Wills card. You see, Topps did not feel Wills was worth paying the $5 it would have taken to sign to a baseball card contract!

Read on to see how such a strange occurrence could have taken place!

Angels begin to narrow field in GM search; Evans added to field

FabforumFormer Dodgers Assistant General Manager Kim Ng is interviewing for the Angels GM job Wednesday, former Dodgers GM Dan Evans will interview for the position Thursday or Friday, and the Angels are expected to receive permission to interview Texas Rangers assistant GM Thad Levine after the World Series is over.

But the team has already begun to narrow the field for Tony Reagins' replacement. New York Yankees executive Damon Oppenheimer, who was interviewed last week in Florida, has been told he is no longer in the running for the job, according to people familiar with the team's GM search who are not authorized to speak publicly on the topic.

Oppenheimer, a 48-year-old Southern California native, is the Yankees' vice president of amateur scouting and has been credited with turning around the team’s minor-league system, one which was considered among the worst in the majors less than a decade ago. The Angels also interviewed Billy Eppler, the Yankees' 36-year-old senior director of pro personnel. Eppler has reportedly been called back for a second interview.

Tampa Bay GM Andrew Friedman appears to be the leading candidate, and as of Tuesday night, the 34-year-old had not pulled himself out of the running. But Friedman is extremely loyal to Rays owner Stuart Sternberg, and the Angels do not seem to have much confidence that they can lure him to Anaheim.

Angels owner Arte Moreno and team President John Carpino flew to Florida to meet with Friedman last week. In addition to Friedman and Eppler, the Angels have formally interviewed Jerry Dipoto, Arizona's senior vice president for scouting and player development; Chicago White Sox assistant GM Rick Hahn; and former New York Mets GM Omar Minaya.

ALSO:

T.J. Simers: Is Arte Moreno the Angels' problem?

Bill Plaschke: Should Mike Scioscia catch hell for trading Mike Napoli?

-- Mike DiGiovanna

Photo: Kim Ng. Credit: John Raoux / Associated Press.

 

Ducks goalie Jonas Hiller unveils new mask

Hillermomask03On Wednesday, Anaheim Ducks goaltender Jonas Hiller received the new mask he will wear during games next month in support of “Movember.”

“Movember” is an annual charity event during the month of November in which men grow mustaches to raise awareness for men’s health issues, specifically prostate and other cancers that affect men.

The mask depicts various members of the Ducks and how they would look with a mustache.

-- Houston Mitchell

Photo: Hiller's new mask. Credit: Airxess.

Game 6 of World Series postponed because of bad weather

Fabforum

The Texas Rangers will have to wait at least one more day to try to win their first World Series title after Wednesday's scheduled Game 6 was postponed because of threatening weather.

Major League Baseball had an afternoon meeting with representatives of the Rangers and St. Louis Cardinals and announced at 2:15 p.m. CDT -- less than five hours before the scheduled first pitch -- that the game would be pushed back a day.

The Rangers lead the best-of-seven series, three games to two

A 50% chance of rain was forecast for game time. And though the skies were overcast and threatening Wednesday afternoon, no rain had fallen since a light morning mist. The protective tarp remained on the Busch Stadium infield.

"Given the desire to play a game of this magnitude without interruption, and an outlook with better conditions over the next two nights, Major League Baseball, along with the Cardinals and the Rangers, determined that making the decision early would be the most prudent course of action to allow fans enough time to plan accordingly," MLB said in a release.

Clear skies but low temperatures are forecast for Thursday.

RELATED:

For Texas and St. Louis, relief is a phone call away

Cardinals' bullpen moves also deserve credit for success

Bill Plaschke: Jamie McCourt's Dodgers' legacy is one of taking and not giving

-- Kevin Baxter in St. Louis

Photo: The tarp covers the field before Game 1 of the World Series. Threatening weather has caused the postponement of Game 6. Credit: Doug Pensinger / Getty Images.

 

Angels begin to narrow field in GM search

FabforumFormer Dodgers Assistant General Manager Kim Ng is interviewing for the Angels GM job Wednesday, and the Angels are expected to receive permission to interview Texas Rangers assistant GM Thad Levine for the position after the World Series is over.

But the team has already begun to narrow the field for Tony Reagins' replacement. New York Yankees executive Damon Oppenheimer, who was interviewed last week in Florida, has been told he is no longer in the running for the job, according to people familiar with the team's GM search who are not authorized to speak publicly on the topic.

Oppenheimer, a 48-year-old Southern California native, is the Yankees' vice president of amateur scouting and has been credited with turning around the team’s minor-league system, one which was considered among the worst in the majors less than a decade ago. The Angels also interviewed Billy Eppler, the Yankees' 36-year-old senior director of pro personnel. Eppler has reportedly been called back for a second interview.

Tampa Bay GM Andrew Friedman appears to be the leading candidate, and as of Tuesday night, the 34-year-old had not pulled himself out of the running. But Friedman is extremely loyal to Rays owner Stuart Sternberg, and the Angels do not seem to have much confidence that they can lure him to Anaheim.

Angels owner Arte Moreno and team President John Carpino flew to Florida to meet with Friedman last week. In addition to Friedman and Eppler, the Angels have formally interviewed Jerry Dipoto, Arizona's senior vice president for scouting and player development; Chicago White Sox assistant GM Rick Hahn; and former New York Mets GM Omar Minaya.

ALSO:

T.J. Simers: Is Arte Moreno the Angels' problem?

Bill Plaschke: Should Mike Scioscia catch hell for trading Mike Napoli?

-- Mike DiGiovanna

Photo: Kim Ng. Credit: John Raoux / Associated Press.

 

Who will play in the BCS championship game?

Alabama's Kenny Bell celebrates his touchdown against Tennessee
Writers from around Tribune Co. discuss the topic. Check back throughout the day for more responses and weigh in with a comment of your own.

Matt Murschel, Orlando Sentinel

The Southeastern Conference has had a representative in the BCS championship game the last five seasons, and there isn't anything that makes me believe that it won’t happen again.

Although LSU appears to be the favorite coming out of the SEC, my feeling is that Alabama will be playing in New Orleans on Jan. 9. The Crimson Tide have the best defense in the country and one of the best running backs in Trent Richardson. Alabama's opponent isn't as cut and dried, but I think it will be Oklahoma State.

The Cowboys have shown they deserve to be the No. 3 team in the BCS standings behind LSU and Alabama. With the third-ranked offense in the country, Oklahoma State has powered its way past opponents this season, and with a remaining schedule that includes Kansas State, Texas Tech and Oklahoma, if the Cowboys can survive, they deserve to play Alabama in the BCS national championship game.

Kevin Love and Blake Griffin on the NBA lockout

Minnesota Timberwolves forward Kevin Love suggested the NBA lockout could hurt his team more than others.

"It's going to be tough to really get our team on the same page because we have such a young group of guys, a young unit of guys, where we're the youngest team in the NBA with a new coach," Love said at a promotional event at Santa Monica sports bar South.

Love, an All-Star who led the league in rebounds last season, intimated that other teams could perhaps better weather the storm.

"Teams like the Lakers, teams like the Dallas Mavericks and teams like the Boston Celtics, they have veteran players who somewhat need the rest in the off-season, a team that knows each other, has the chemistry, have played with each other.

"They'll kind of jump into the season when the season is started and the lockout is finished, and jump off where they were last year. With a team like us, we need time on the floor together."

Love was not the only player to express concern about the lockout.

Clippers forward Blake Griffin, who missed the 2009 season after sustaining a broken left kneecap in the final preseason game, seemed peeved that he's once again being kept off of the court.

"It's very frustrating," said Griffin, who was Rookie of the Year last season. "I think it's frustrating for all the players. We all want to be out there. We want to be playing."

— Melissa Rohlin

Terrell Owens: Would you want him on your NFL team? [Poll]

Owens_640
Terrell Owens held a workout Tuesday to show that he is fully recovered from a knee injury and ready to play in the NFL again. But the NFL may not be ready to have him back -- no scouts showed up.

Owens is a six-time Pro Bowl player and is second all-time in receiving yards and touchdown catches. But there could be lingering questions about the knee, or his age (37) or the all the drama he often brings along with him.

Would you like your team to take a chance on Owens? Vote in the poll and leave a comment explaining why you voted the way you did.

ALSO:

New England-Pittsburgh matchup a battle of AFC heavyweights

As (Andrew) Luck would have it, Stanford quarterback tunes out the noise

-- Chuck Schilken

Photo: Terrell Owens talks to the media following a workout at Calabasas High on Tuesday. Credit: Gary Friedman / Los Angeles Times

WTA Championships Diary: Grunting issue rears its head as Stosur upsets Sharapova in Istanbul


Tenth time lucky: Sam Stosur defeated Maria Sharapova for the first time in Istanbul


To grunt or not to grunt

Grunting has become the issue of the day once again after Caroline Wozniacki revealed that from her point of view, when opponents grunt, it disguises the way they’ve hit the ball, and how hard they’ve hit it. The WTA is committed to finding a way to tackle the grunting issue, but crucially catching it early when players are still young before it becomes embedded in their style of play.


What do you think? Will that work? Or is it something we're going to have to live with.


Speaking of noise, one of a rather different sort is Petra Kvitova’s who screeches like a swooping eagle every time she wins a point. It’s extraordinary. The Wimbledon champion delivered a topsy turvy performance to beat Zvonareva 6-2, 6-4, afterwards admitting that she was very nervous.


Nobody beats Sam Stosur 10 times in a row…

At least not Maria Sharapova. Stosur produced a true ‘winning ugly’ performance in a way, her strengths nullified by the slower court, to beat the Russian 6-1, 7-5 for the first time in her career. Sharapova produced 30 unforced errors to Stosur’s 18, and is clearly not 100%. But still. It was a big win for the Aussie.  “To win without using your best strengths I think is a big bonus,” Stosur said.


Still on top

Caroline Wozniacki delivered a virtuoso Caroline Wozniacki performance, winning a match she was expected to win, despite looking for most of it like she might lose it during her 5-7, 6-2, 6-4 victory over Agnieszka Radwanska. Wozniacki had three set points to win the first set, squandered them, but gritted her way through the next two, urged on by some exuberant on court coaching from father Piotr Wozniacki. Whatever anyone thinks about Wozniacki’s style of play, there’s no denying the girl can fight till she’s flat on the floor.


Winning the numbers game

Both Sharapova and Vera Zvonareva confessed to being “impressed” by the numbers of fans who had flocked to the opening day yesterday. With attendance surpassing 10,000, the fans were not only in their seats, but also fully engaged with what was going on the court, producing tuneful, and some not so tuneful, chants throughout all three matches.


“Pretty incredible,” said Sharapova about the atmosphere. “Yeah, I mean, to see I think it was like about 10,000 people out there, so enthusiastic and you never quite know what to expect when you come to a new place and a new city at an event like this. And I think that the attention that the tournament has got and the respect that the players have received has been really incredible. It's really nice to see.”


Multi-linguals

Credit to the umpires, who may well be dressed rather like air hosts and hostesses, but have seemingly mastered the Turkish language after just one day.


 Coming up…

Sam Stosur v Victoria Azarenka

Another bout of ‘I have never’ for Stosur, who is yet to beat the Belarusian. This is their fifth meeting, all of which have been on hard courts, but they have never played indoors, so perhaps that will make a difference. Stosur should be high on confidence after beating Sharapova yesterday, but will that make it easier or harder for her to pull off a repeat? I think Azarenka might have too much for her.


 Maria Sharapova v Li Na

Sharapova did not look her best by any means yesterday, but the fact that she has still made it to No 2 in the world this year shows that it’s certainly still there. Li on the other hand is the first to admit she hasn’t been hitting a ball in the court lately. So this could be interesting. Sharapova leads the head to head 5-3, and should really make it 6-3.


Caroline Wozniacki v Vera Zvonareva

Tied at 4-4 in their head to head, the last time these two met, Zvonareva came out on top, in the Doha final. But whether she has the weapons to break down Wozniacki remains to be seen. As she proved last night, the Dane can run and run from Europe to Asia and back again, so the smart money would be on her.


Catchphrase

“I think if there is any court that Radwanska likes, that’s slow. So I’m not sure what the complaint is about.”


A gentle dig from Sharapova about Radwanska’s court speed preference. The Pole had said she found the court a bit slow.


The daily click

Highlights from day one…


<object width="460" height="264"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iUOH8iekwZo?version=3&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iUOH8iekwZo?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="460" height="264" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>



Did Team Lotus miss a trick by not announcing Karun Chandhok earlier in the year?


Feel very sorry for Team Lotus reserve Karun Chandhok that he won't get to race in the inaugural Indian GP, especially after all the work he has done to promote the event and especially considering it was widely taken for granted when he signed at the start of the year that he would be racing in Delhi.


As Tony Fernandes said, Team Lotus are in a tricky position, with 10th place in the championship – which is worth a reported $33 million to their coffers rather than $10 million for 11th – still not assured. He went for the experience of Jarno Trulli.


“While all the emotional reasons for him [Chandhok] driving were right,” said Fernandes, "we were conscious that the limited running he has had in the car this season, largely due to the weather conditions that have hit most of his FP1 sessions, has not given him the best preparation for this race. So we have taken the very difficult decision not to run him in this weekend.”


It may have been a pragmatic decision – and I'm sure Fernandes feels bad about it – but I can't help but think that the team missed a trick here. I'm no sponsorship expert but if Lotus had confirmed Chandhok for India months ago, surely they could have picked up additional sponsors and made it work financially? By leaving it so late to make a decision, perhaps sponsors were unsure or unwilling to commit? Even if they couldn't have picked up big contracts the Team Lotus brand would have been given a big boost in this region so the long-term benefits may have been considerable.


There is also the question of whether Chandhok would have done so much worse than Jarno Trulli on Sunday anyway.


Either way, Chandhok reacted with commendable (and prudent, considering his position) dignity. "Everyone knows the most important and emotional race for any driver is their home race and particularly so in my case," he said. "I've been involved with the project since the track was an empty piece of land. There's such a buzz in India at the moment – I've done 28 interviews in the last two days."


"I'm sure it's been a tough call for Tony to make and on some level I think he's feeling some pain about it as we've always had a good personal relationship. I joined this team mainly because of him and his faith in me while looking at the long term. I continue to hope that this long term plan bears fruit and I hope that one day I get to race for him again."


"I'm so proud to support the Jaypee Group in this historic weekend for Indian sport. For all the fans, including the hundreds from my home town in Chennai who have bought tickets in the hope of seeing me race and are travelling thousands of kilometres to Delhi, I hope that they all still have a wonderful time at the BIC."



Countries with a clenbuterol problem should be banned from hosting sporting events


Last week’s revelation that an astonishing 109 footballers taking part in this summer’s Under-17 World Cup tested positive for the banned anabolic steroid clenbuterol after eating contaminated meat poses a serious threat to world sport.


Both Fifa and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) are taking no action against any of the affected players because of the “compelling evidence” that tainted meat was to blame, while WADA has dropped two separate cases involving clenbuterol ‘positives’ in Mexico and warned athletes to “exercise extreme caution” about what they eat when visiting the South American country.


But the fall-out extends well beyond Mexico’s borders. Telegraph Sport today highlights the case of 22 year-old British sprint hurdler Callum Priestley, who is serving a two-year ban after testing positive for clenbuterol while on an official UK Athletics training camp in South Africa in 2010.


His claims that he had eaten contaminated meat at the UK Athletics hotel, and that he was even treated for food poisoning at the time of his drug test, failed to carry any weight with his disciplinary panel and his punishment was confirmed.


Although his ban expires in February, Priestley, once considered one of Britain’s brightest young track prospects, is so disillusioned by his experience that he has now quit the sport.


Michele Verokken, the former head of anti-doping in Britain, is convinced he was innocent though whether he was really telling the truth we will never be known for sure because once the meat was consumed, the evidence vanished.


Under the WADA code, the onus is on the athlete to prove his or her innocence, which Priestley was unable to do.


This central tenet of anti-doping regulations, that athletes are deemed guilty until proven innocent, will be tested again next month when the Court of Arbitration for Sport hears an appeal by WADA and UCI, the cycling world governing body, against the decision of the Spanish cycling federation to clear Spanish cyclist Alberto Contador after he tested positive for clenbuterol on his way to victory in the 2010 Tour de France.


The amount of the steroid found in Contador’s sample was infinitesimal compared to the levels recorded by some of the teenage footballers in Mexico. Contador’s problem is that, like Priestley, he has no real proof to substantiate his claim that his failed drug test was caused by contaminated meat that originated in Spain, a country where there is no firm evidence of clenbuterol use in livestock rearing.


But, with athletes’ careers at stake, it simply not good enough for WADA to exonerate athletes who fail drug tests in one country and prosecute them in another.


As things stand at the moment, an athlete wanting to cheat could catch a plane to Guadalajara, pump himself full of clenbuterol to receive its full muscle-building benefits and then look forward to being cleared of all blame if the drug-tester comes knocking.


The situation is a mess and some proper research is urgently required to establish the extent of the clenbuterol problem in farming worldwide to avoid a cheats’ charter in some countries while potentially banning innocent athletes elsewhere.


Countries where there is a proven problem need more than a WADA health warning. They must be barred from hosting any major international sporting events until they can put their house in order. Anything less puts athletes at unacceptable risk.


The case of Priestley also highlights the need federations to ensure that if an athlete falls ill while on an official training camp or at a competition, then the cause of that illness is thoroughly investigated in the same way that a tweaked knee would automatically be scanned.


If they refuse, then the athlete should insist. Doing nothing could mean the end of their career.



Did Team Lotus miss a trick by not announcing Karun Chandhok earlier?


Feel very sorry for Team Lotus reserve Karun Chandhok that he won't get to race in the inaugural Indian GP after all, especially after all the work he has done to promote the event and especially considering it was widely taken for granted when he signed at the start of the year that he would be racing in Delhi.


As Tony Fernandes said, Team Lotus were in a tricky position, with 10th place in the championship – which is worth a reported $33 million to their coffers rather than $10 million for 10th – still not assured. He went for the experience of Jarno Trulli.


“While all the emotional reasons for him [Chandhok] driving were right,” said Fernandes, "we were conscious that the limited running he has had in the car this season, largely due to the weather conditions that have hit most of his FP1 sessions, has not given him the best preparation for this race. So we have taken the very difficult decision not to run him in this weekend.”


It may have been a pragmatic decision – and I'm sure Fernandes does feel bad about it – but I can't help but feel that the team missed a trick here. I'm no sponsorship expert but surely if Lotus had confirmed Chandhok for India months ago, they could have picked up additional sponsors and made it work financially? By leaving it so late to make a decision, perhaps sponsors were unsure or unwilling to commit?


Even if they couldn't have picked up big contracts the Team Lotus name would have been given a big boost in this region so the long-term benefits may have been considerable. There is also the question of whether Chandhok would have done so much worse than Jarno Trulli on Sunday anyway.


Either way, Chandhok reacted with commendable dignity. "Everyone knows the most important and emotional race for any driver is their home race and particularly so in my case," he said. "I've been involved with the project since the track was an empty piece of land. There's such a buzz in India at the moment – I've done 28 interviews in the last two days."


"I'm sure it's been a tough call for Tony to make and on some level I think he's feeling some pain about it as we've always had a good personal relationship. I joined this team mainly because of him and his faith in me while looking at the long term. I continue to hope that this long term plan bears fruit and I hope that one day I get to race for him again."


"I'm so proud to support the Jaypee Group in this historic weekend for Indian sport. For all the fans, including the hundreds from my home town in Chennai who have bought tickets in the hope of seeing me race and are travelling thousands of kilometres to Delhi, I hope that they all still have a wonderful time at the BIC."



Comment

Comment