Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Losing Steve Smith to Eagles Is Another Blow for Giants

Does it seem that the terrain between Philadelphia and New York/New Jersey has been tilted toward Pennsylvania? That DeSean Jackson and the Eagles have never stopped distancing themselves from the Giants  since Matt Dodge punted the ball at Jackson instead of out of bounds?

Steve Smith, Giant stalwart and Eli Manning security blanket, is the latest talented free agent to join the Eagles after he rejected a lesser offer from the Giants. Smith, who is still recovering from knee surgery and may miss most of the first half of the season,  said on his Facebook page:

I will always cherish my time in NY and the super bowl victory.. This was obviously not an easy decision for me or something i ever expected but unfortunately the business aspect proved that the eagles wanted me to be part of their organization MUCH more than the Giants did.. A special thanks to my WR buddies, coach Gilbride, all of u amazing fans on here, and the entire giants organization for drafting me.. Time for a new beginning…

It may be a case of dueling doctors.

Clark Judge of CBSSports.com:

What seems apparent here is that the Eagles’ physicians must think that Smith is farther along in his recovery than the Giants’ physicians.

Extra point: Smith, a second-round pick in 2007, has been a great value for the Giants. He helped them win a Super Bowl. For Giants fans, this is turning into something of a traumatic off-season. How could General Manager Jerry Reese let Smith go to a division rival that seems loaded with promise? Set aside talent for a moment. Is it a concern that the Giants are losing such well-respected guys — Shaun O’Hara, Rich Seubert, Kevin Boss, Smith — in the locker room?

Parcells Returns to ESPN

Bill Parcells was hired by ESPN as an N.F.L. studio analyst on Wednesday. Again.

Parcells’s roster of coaching and TV jobs is nearly as long as the list of game shows hosted by Wink Martindale. The ex-Giants, ex-Patriots, ex-Jets, ex-Cowboys coach and former executive vice president of the Dolphins has slotted network jobs into his coaching hiatuses since leaving the Giants in 1991.

In that year, he held two jobs. He worked on NBC’s studio show, “The N.F.L. Live,” and co-hosted a weekly program with Mike Francesa on the MSG Network, which was canceled after that season.

Late that season, Parcells backed out of an offer to coach Tampa Bay, then snubbed the Packers.

In 1992, NBC shifted him to game analysis with Marv Albert. That soon ended.

From 1993 to 2000, he was too occupied coaching the Patriots and the Jets (where he spent his final year as general manager) to sign TV deals. But in 2001 he was a guest studio analyst for ESPN, which led to a long-term contract with ESPN in 2002.

“This is the end of it,” Parcells declared of his coaching desires at the time. No one believed him, and a late-season report by CBS (where Parcells has never worked) of a meeting with the Cowboys owner Jerry Jones turned into a four-season interruption in his TV career.

In 2007, freed of coaching, he returned to ESPN. That lasted a season before he left to run the Dolphins’ football operations, a job that essentially ended last October. Now, he’s back at ESPN.

ESPN is now home to three former Jets coaches: Parcells, Herman Edwards and Eric Mangini, who was hired last week. Parcells the studio analyst has never been as interesting or quotable as Parcells the coach. But he had the type of credentials (a 172-130 record and two Super Bowls) that ESPN loves. Mangini’s 33-47 record, combined with his blandness, inaccessibility and secrecy as a coach, do not suggest TV greatness.

ESPN’s publicity department created a selective biography for Mangini. In a see-no-failures news release announcing his hiring, it noted that in his first season with the Jets “he led them to a 10-6 record and a playoff berth after the team finished 4-12 the previous year.” But it skipped the 4-12 record he led the Jets to in 2007 or the twin 5-11 records he led the Cleveland Browns to in his two seasons there.

PGA Championship: Will it be Tiger Woods? Rory McIlroy?

PGA Championship: Rory McIlroy
Who will win this week's PGA Championship? Tiger Woods? Rory McIlroy? Steve Williams ... er, Adam Scott?

Writers from around Tribune Co. share their opinions. Check back throughout the day for more responses and feel free to weigh in with a comment of your own.

Diane Pucin, Los Angeles Times

It would probably be best if Adam Scott/Steve Williams didn't win this week. The sport couldn't take that post-match chat again.

Tiger Woods isn't going to win  -- not after talking about how his season is a success because his knee doesn't hurt. Now he just needs a pain-free knee to be happy? No majors, no chipping away at the Nicklaus record? Not even a Wells Fargo or Waste Management run-of-the-mill tournament? Wow.

So let's go against the grain a little bit and give tennis a little love by picking Rory McIlroy to cap off a brilliant, pain-free, winning-heavy summer with another major.

The tennis part? He seems to be dating top-ranked Caroline Wozniacki. It must be serious because nicknames are being created -– WozIlroy, Mcniacki -– and that only happens to really serious famous couples, such as Brangelina.

Dating a famous tennis player didn't work out so well for another top-notch golfer. Sergio Garcia never did much when he was attached to Martina Hingis. But Hingis was the winner in that couple. Wozniacki may be No. 1, but she hasn't come close to winning a Grand Slam event. So McIlroy it is.

USC football: Rhett Ellison enjoying work at fullback

Other than receiver Robert Woods, no one caught more passes for USC last season than tight end Rhett Ellison.

But Ellison, a 6-foot-5, 250-pound senior, is working at fullback during training camp.

Coach Lane Kiffin said Ellison’s experience and knowledge of the offense is enabling the Trojans to learn the position while younger players such as Randall Telfer, Xavier Grimble and Christian Thomas work at tight end.

Ellison is enjoying the move, and the perspective from the backfield as opposed to the line of scrimmage.

“You can see what everybody’s doing so you can kind of find your spot, find your window and see who you have to beat,” Ellison said after Wednesday’s morning practice. “It’s cool. It’s a different view.”

Ellison caught 21 passes, three for touchdowns, in 2010. His reception total is expected to climb this season whether he is coming out of the backfield or lining up at tight end when the Trojans open Sept. 3 against Minnesota.

Ellison said he was not thinking about how the versatility might help his NFL prospects.

“I just look at it as a way to get onto the field more here,” he said. “The more I can do for USC, the better.”

Quick hits

The Trojans will practice in full pads Wednesday night…. Linebacker Chris Galippo is scheduled for an MRI exam on his right shoulder, Kiffin said. Galippo was injured during Tuesday’s workout…. Offensive lineman Aundrey Walker sat out most of practice because of hip soreness…. Receiver Markeith Ambles has not been participating in workouts and won’t until he is declared academically eligible, Kiffin said. Summer-session grades are expected to be posted soon.

More later at latimes.com/sports.

-- Gary Klein

The wave at sporting events: Ride it or wipe it out? [Poll]

A curious rift has emerged concerning a seemingly harmless activity that has become a fixture at sporting events everywhere over the last several decades.

The wave.

The Times' David Wharton writes about how people are taking sides when it comes to the ubiquitous ritual, particularly at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington, Texas:

Fans of a certain mind-set ... have complained often enough that the team now shows a partly humorous, partly serious message on the scoreboard. It warns that throwing your arms into the air can cause muscle strains and should be confined to "pro football games and Miley Cyrus concerts."

On the other side of this ideological divide, a not-so-silent majority has risen to the challenge. Literally.

"There is a segment of people who see our sign and do the wave," a Rangers executive said. "It's actually going stronger than ever."

Which side are you on? Love it? Hate it? Depends on your mood or how the home team is doing at the moment? Vote in the poll, then leave a comment telling us just how strongly you feel about this great (or not-so great) tradition.

ALSO:

Poll: Which two teams will play in the world series?

Bill Plaschke: Why does the MLB allow arguments with umpires?

-- Chuck Schilken

London 2012 Olympics: sport is the way to get kids out of this awful mess


As one or two of you might have noticed I’ve been a bit sniffy in the past over “Legacy” – both the term itself and the concept – because for me sport is its own justification and doesn’t need to pander to others.


You run and jump because you enjoy it and it inspires you and others and you stage the Olympics for basically the same reasons.


But my view changed radically watching the carnage on our streets yesterday, in a good way I might add.


Looking around the debris of our great cities with marauding youths prowling like feral rats it came home with a crashing impact of exactly how far Britain has sunk as a society and how sport – played properly and with its stars embracing the responsibility of role models – is probably the best way out of this hell hole.


MPs expenses, phone hacking and the economic crash have all contributed to demoralising this country. The list goes on.


Sport is the way out, not just a distraction but the way out.


Many commentators pointed out that we are spending over £9billion on the Olympics at a time of economic crisis and I have sometimes struggled with that concept myself but not anymore. Not after yesterday.


Rarely in our recent history has this country needed to identify and promote aspirational young sportsmen and the Olympics is the perfect vehicle.


The exact definition of legacy doesn’t concern me and politicians should stop debating it as if it were some philosophical concept – what I want to see next summer is young British competitors of all shapes and sizes, colours and creeds setting an example in performance and attitude in everything they do that their so-called elders and betters have lamentably failed to to.



What does Mike Ashley actually want to achieve with Newcastle United?


It is a question Newcastle United fans have been asking ever since he bought the club in the summer of 2007, but what does Mike Ashley actually want to do with it?


It is a question he has never felt the need to answer. In fact, he has never felt the need to answer any questions during the course of four difficult years as owner.


There is no conclusive answer because Ashley simply hasn’t given one, so in its absence all we can do make an educated guess based on actions and off the record briefings from Newcastle’s managing director Derek Llambias.


The conclusions I have drawn are unlikely to make pleasant reading for those who can still remember standing toe-to-toe with Manchester United for the Premier League title on more than one occasion.


A club that has qualified for the Champions League three times, more than any other side outside the traditional Big Four – Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United.


As far as I can tell, Ashley’s ambition amounts to keeping Newcastle United in the Premier League as a self-sufficient business which occupies little of his time and none of his money.

Having spent £286m to buy the club and then keep it afloat following a relegation to the Championship his bad decision making facilitated – Joe Kinnear as manager, Dennis Wise as Director of Football anyone? – Newcastle’s owner does not want to have to spend a penny more.


He will not put any money in, but neither will he take any out. He expects the club to survive in the top flight without his help, maybe dabble with a cup run.


The suspicion is Ashley just wants to keep things ticking over until someone buys it from him and pays back the interest free loans, totalling more than £111, put in.


When Andy Carroll was sold, fans were told all the money would go into the strengthening of the side, Ashley has used it to strengthen the books of a business which previously lost him money.


That is his prerogative, he is the owner and there is no rule or stipulation he has to bankroll the club, match the expectations of supporters or throw money at new players in the vague hope it will be restored to former glories.


Newcastle United are not up for sale because of the uncertainty it breeds, but if you have a spare £300m knocking about and you want to buy arguably the last English club able to achieve something with the right investment, it rapidly would be.


But that wasn’t Ashley’s initial intention, he bought Newcastle United to turn it into European football contenders, to have fun, or so we were told by those – former chief executive Chris Mort and now Llambias – employed to run it for him. So where did it all go wrong?


Naturally suspicious of the media, initially the business journalists who covered his rise to riches, and then the football hacks who yearned to know what he had in store for a football club light on achievements, but big on ambition.


Newcastle United is a great football club which rarely achieves great things. It is an iconic brand, one of the “crown jewels of English football” as Ashley – in one rare public comment shortly after his takeover – described it.


Initially perceived as a knight in shining armour, liberating Newcastle United after years of dissatisfaction under the Hall-Shepherd alliance, he was the billionaire who would rival Roman Abramovich’s spending at Chelsea.


Even when it quickly became apparent he was not interested in blowing a big chunk of his personal fortune on new players, Ashley retained his popularity even if only because he had removed the former chairman, Freddie Shepherd, from office.


From what little information there was about him, Ashley came across as a self-made man; a common man with an extraordinary talent for business. He was a bold entrepreneur with a sharp eye for an opportunity, a gambler who had taken huge risks and won.


He bought Newcastle United because he loved football and had the money knocking around to buy his own club to play with.

Nothing new there, the only difference is it takes a billionaire, rather than a millionaire to do it in the Premier League.


At the back of his mind, though, Ashley probably felt there was the chance to make a profit. Football was riding the crest of a wave, the country as a whole was still in the boom before the bust and football clubs were traded as hot property.


It has not worked out like that, partly because of a global recession, partly because football is a business, but it is a business not quite like any other.


There is too much emotion involved. The personalities are different, they have egos and will not simply be told what to do. The media interest is not like any other. It means too much to people for the same belligerent rules that have served Ashley so well in his business empire to apply.


Not content with alienating one club legend in Kevin Keegan in his second season, Ashley managed another in Alan Shearer.

On both occasions Ashley brought them on board and fell out with them to his cost. In Keegan’s case because of broken promises about control of recruitment and in Shearer’s because the club was up for sale following relegation in 2009 and he didn’t want to spend the money the former Newcastle captain required to build for the future.


Keegan’s resignation in complaint at boardroom interference – in other words Wise’s control over transfers – was the beginning of the end for Ashley, even if that end remains out of sight.


He had a shot at salvation with Shearer, but blew it. He even had another shot when he covered huge losses during one season in the Championship. He wasn’t popular, as such, be he was appreciated a little more.


The sale of Carroll and Kevin Nolan, last season’s top goalscorers, combined with the treatment of Chris Hughton, and the lack of spending on new players this summer means he has probably blown it again.


According to research done by one fan’s website, Newcastle United have made a profit of more than £31m in the transfer market since 2006, by far the highest figure in the Premier League. http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/2006-2011.html


Ashley brought Newcastle to have some fun and he did for the first year, sitting and drinking with fans at away games. He wanted to be one of the lads and he was accepted.


But as soon as that went following Keegan’s resignation so, it seems, did Ashley’s enthusiasm. The knight in shining armour had been knocked off his horse by King Kev.


He is abused and he is resented and he knows it. He is a very rich man, but why should he continue to spend his own money to bring success to a club and supporters who have made it perfectly clear they don’t like, thank or respect him?


It is an increasingly well-run business, which in one of Llambias’ favourite phrases, can wipe its own nose, yet supporters are still more likely to wipe a tear from their eye.


They don’t care about books being balanced, they care about what happens on a match day and this is a club which once aimed for far more than a shot at a top ten finish.



Comment

Comment